Hip Health Testing

One really can't stress enough the importance of health testing when breeding animals.  There are so many hereditary things that can be passed down from parents to offspring that it's crucial for a responsible breeder to do as much health testing as possible.   While nothing in life is perfect, a responsible breeder will test their dogs to try to avoid health issues in offspring.

This leads me to the topic of hip testing.  The norm in the breeding world in the US is to use a company called OFA or the Orthapedic Foundation for Animals.  They look at one view of an x-ray of a dogs hips and grade it.  You can get either an "Excellent," "Good," "Fair," "Borderline" or some degree of hip dysplasia.  The thing to note which is quite frustrating to me is that the OFA will grade anything you send to them.  If the hips are not positioned properly, the OFA will still grade the hips.  They don't send the x-rays back and tell you to redo them so the hips are positioned correctly.  To me, this is just plain laziness on the part of the OFA.   

When it happened to me, I decided to see what other options were out there and made the decision to use the BVA or British Veterinary Association.   I import my dogs from Europe so it made sense to me to use their hip scheme.   They look at the same view an OFA vet will look at, but the difference is they will give you a number score between 0-53 on each hip.  Their scores are like a golfer's game....the lower the score, the better.   The "standard" score that most breeders use is a total score of 20 or under, but some breeders require lower scores than that.  And some will use higher scores if they know the scores of the ancestors behind a dog.  The thing I appreciate about the BVA is if a hip is not positioned properly, they will send the x-ray back to you refusing to grade it.   The BVA only gives you a grade once in the lifetime of a dog and they want to make sure they are grading fairly.  You can send your x-rays to the OFA over and over again.    But the OFA refers back to anything you've submitted previously instead of grading the x-ray for how it looks that day.  They also don't tell you what degree of "Good" or "Fair" your dog may be.  Are they just barely fair or good?    As you can tell, it's just not a system I am a fan of.

There are MANY breeders who have been breeding for years who won't look at a dog without an OFA rating.   And there are many more who will tell prospective puppy owners to ask about health testing.  While I agree that puppy families should know how healthy the parents of their puppies are, I also believe there are different hip schemes that as good or better than what the OFA offers.   For me and  my dogs it's the BVA.